Archive for ‘race’

July 23, 2013

Mastering the Tight Rope: Obama Nails Race in Remarks Following Zimmerman Verdict

Shout out On Being A Black Lawyer for the love they’ve shown of late. This is a piece which the published with reactions to the President’s remarks following the Zimmerman verdict. #noTavis.

Original Link: http://www.onbeingablacklawyer.com/wordpress/mastering-the-tight-rope-obama-nails-race-in-remarks-following-zimmerman-verdict

Enjoy.

Picture 53When I tuned into President Obama’s impromptu remarks today in the wake of the Zimmerman verdict, I was admittedly nervous and full of mixed emotions. For as much as I wanted the President to weigh in on the verdict, I knew that any comment would draw ire from at least one, if not multiple, constituent groups. Like many Americans, despite having some understanding of how it happened, I was still struggling to reconcile what was billed to be justice, yet just didn’t seem fair. I wondered what the President might say and whether commenting on the case would set poor precedent and invite future pressure or if saying anything at all would shift the focus away from the Martin family’s continued fight for equal justice.

Before he began, I braced myself because I was unsure which Obama would show up. The nation’s first black President has always had to operate from a precarious position on race matters and his approach has often drawn a wide range of reactions. In 2008, during his first campaign for the presidency, he delivered what many considered a groundbreaking speech on race, addressing the matter as someone of mixed heritage in the context of political pressure stemming from his ties to controversial clergyman Dr. Jerimiah Wright. That was Obama the candidate. As President, he has sometimes seemed too congenial on the topic, like when he invited black intellectual Skip Gates and a police officer to the White House for a beer and a “teachable moment” following the officer’s arrest of Gates in his own home. Even as the country digested the Zimmerman verdict from varied perspectives, friends and foes alike were quick to point to the coded language the President had used in addressing gun violence in his hometown of Chicago without ever squarely referencing black on black crime.

Still, as the President began to speak, all of those concerns disappeared. Any worries about a watered down or politicized speech immediately evaporated within Obama’s honest and heartfelt words. He gave a voice to the Black man in America, not as the President, but as a black man in America. The powerful irony of what he had to say was its context: a black man, the President of the United States of America, was identifying himself with a segment of the population that, despite achieving the highest office in the land, cannot escape the feeling of being marginalized to a place of second class citizenship. He took his initial remarks on the case, about having a son who would look like Trayvon Martin, and stepped even further, remarking that 35 yrs. ago, he himself might have been Trayvon. I am usually loathe to speak in hyperbole, but I believe that today’s remarks may be the highlight of the Obama administration as it relates to black America. Osama Bin Laden may have been the most wanted man in the world, but he wasn’t keeping black men unemployed. The Affordable Health Care Act is great, but hasn’t stopped folks from catching hell. This meant something. It was HUGE. One of us, the President of the United States of America, was speaking to America for all of us. More than that, he was speaking through the lens of his own personal experience, and finally using the unique advantage he holds over his 43 predecessors, speaking from a place of empathy while they could only have hoped to speak from a place of sympathy.
In today’s speech, the President displayed a mastery of the tightrope that is addressing race in 2013 America while still being the President of all Americans. He did this by not ignoring the issue or being an apologist, but by speaking directly to it while still remaining an optimist and highlighting progress. One thing that cannot be lost in terms of significance of the President’s remarks is the incredible amount of courage that he displayed. The President knows the backlash he will receive from those who prefer to act as if we are in a post-racial society. He knows the GOP, FOX News and others will accuse him of race-baiting and divisive tactics.
He knows that even some within his own community will criticize him for taking too long or not saying enough. He didn’t HAVE to say anything.
But, he did.
He was sincere, he was thoughtful, and he was candid. But, more than that, he was finally the President that black America has been waiting on in a moment where, perhaps, we needed him most.
Charles F. Coleman Jr. is a former King’s County (Brooklyn, NY) Assistant District Attorney and a federal civil rights trial attorney.  Follow him on Twitter @CFColemanJr


July 22, 2013

Pause & Consider: Race, Jurors, and Perspective

by: The Civil Writer

One of the things I have found most interesting about the Zimmerman trial, that I haven’t had an opportunity to fully explore in conversation is how the issue of identity politics played into the jury and jury selection.

The prosecution banked on the fact that the identity of mothers on the jury would prevail over all else and carry the sympathy factor. While it is less clear which factor the defense felt would trump (race, or gun ownership, for example), they clearly weren’t as concerned about the fact that there would be mothers on the jury–or, they gambled that the mother-piece could be just as advantageous to their client if they could show Zimmerman to have acted out of fear for his life. Whatever the point(s) they used, the defense made a better calculation in this vein.

The mysterious Juror B37

I do not think the prosecution gave the proper amount of credence to race in terms of identity politics. There may have been an underestimating of whether white jurors might feel some commonality with Zimmerman because of his race or be susceptible to buying into the aggressive demonization of Trayvon Martin by the defense. Part of how this can so easily occur is for folks who do not regularly deal with race as part of their every day existence, the blinders that they have on cannot easily be lifted.

They missed this because they would not be called to think about this, normally, in any complex, critical or multi-faceted manner. (SN: How you allow a juror to sit when she refers to a victim as a “boy of color” escapes me but, I digress.). It isn’t as simple as making a determination about whether someone is a racist–the racial element of this trial was much more complicated than that. It extends to being able to understand and rank how important race is when you are discussing identity politics and how they would impact this particular situation.

Suffice to say, when it is a matter of life and death, freedom v. jail, innocence v. guilt, race might not trump all…but, it’s pretty damn high.

‪#‎staytuned‬