Archive for ‘analysis’

July 23, 2013

Mastering the Tight Rope: Obama Nails Race in Remarks Following Zimmerman Verdict

Shout out On Being A Black Lawyer for the love they’ve shown of late. This is a piece which the published with reactions to the President’s remarks following the Zimmerman verdict. #noTavis.

Original Link: http://www.onbeingablacklawyer.com/wordpress/mastering-the-tight-rope-obama-nails-race-in-remarks-following-zimmerman-verdict

Enjoy.

Picture 53When I tuned into President Obama’s impromptu remarks today in the wake of the Zimmerman verdict, I was admittedly nervous and full of mixed emotions. For as much as I wanted the President to weigh in on the verdict, I knew that any comment would draw ire from at least one, if not multiple, constituent groups. Like many Americans, despite having some understanding of how it happened, I was still struggling to reconcile what was billed to be justice, yet just didn’t seem fair. I wondered what the President might say and whether commenting on the case would set poor precedent and invite future pressure or if saying anything at all would shift the focus away from the Martin family’s continued fight for equal justice.

Before he began, I braced myself because I was unsure which Obama would show up. The nation’s first black President has always had to operate from a precarious position on race matters and his approach has often drawn a wide range of reactions. In 2008, during his first campaign for the presidency, he delivered what many considered a groundbreaking speech on race, addressing the matter as someone of mixed heritage in the context of political pressure stemming from his ties to controversial clergyman Dr. Jerimiah Wright. That was Obama the candidate. As President, he has sometimes seemed too congenial on the topic, like when he invited black intellectual Skip Gates and a police officer to the White House for a beer and a “teachable moment” following the officer’s arrest of Gates in his own home. Even as the country digested the Zimmerman verdict from varied perspectives, friends and foes alike were quick to point to the coded language the President had used in addressing gun violence in his hometown of Chicago without ever squarely referencing black on black crime.

Still, as the President began to speak, all of those concerns disappeared. Any worries about a watered down or politicized speech immediately evaporated within Obama’s honest and heartfelt words. He gave a voice to the Black man in America, not as the President, but as a black man in America. The powerful irony of what he had to say was its context: a black man, the President of the United States of America, was identifying himself with a segment of the population that, despite achieving the highest office in the land, cannot escape the feeling of being marginalized to a place of second class citizenship. He took his initial remarks on the case, about having a son who would look like Trayvon Martin, and stepped even further, remarking that 35 yrs. ago, he himself might have been Trayvon. I am usually loathe to speak in hyperbole, but I believe that today’s remarks may be the highlight of the Obama administration as it relates to black America. Osama Bin Laden may have been the most wanted man in the world, but he wasn’t keeping black men unemployed. The Affordable Health Care Act is great, but hasn’t stopped folks from catching hell. This meant something. It was HUGE. One of us, the President of the United States of America, was speaking to America for all of us. More than that, he was speaking through the lens of his own personal experience, and finally using the unique advantage he holds over his 43 predecessors, speaking from a place of empathy while they could only have hoped to speak from a place of sympathy.
In today’s speech, the President displayed a mastery of the tightrope that is addressing race in 2013 America while still being the President of all Americans. He did this by not ignoring the issue or being an apologist, but by speaking directly to it while still remaining an optimist and highlighting progress. One thing that cannot be lost in terms of significance of the President’s remarks is the incredible amount of courage that he displayed. The President knows the backlash he will receive from those who prefer to act as if we are in a post-racial society. He knows the GOP, FOX News and others will accuse him of race-baiting and divisive tactics.
He knows that even some within his own community will criticize him for taking too long or not saying enough. He didn’t HAVE to say anything.
But, he did.
He was sincere, he was thoughtful, and he was candid. But, more than that, he was finally the President that black America has been waiting on in a moment where, perhaps, we needed him most.
Charles F. Coleman Jr. is a former King’s County (Brooklyn, NY) Assistant District Attorney and a federal civil rights trial attorney.  Follow him on Twitter @CFColemanJr


July 22, 2013

Trial Attorney Charles F. Coleman Jr. Gives Reasons for Zimmerman Accquittal

So the civil writer himself was featured in Rolling Out after trying to provide a plain speak explanation to the Zimmerman verdict.* The original article can be found here but is also cut and pasted below. Big shout to @M320_consulting for the placement although something must be done to permanently remove the “husky” photos off the internet!

Trial attorney Charles F. Coleman Jr. gives reasons for George Zimmerman acquittal

10:00 AM EDT
7/16/2013 by Terry Shropshire

charles coleman2

As a seasoned trial attorney, Charles Coleman Jr. was not surprised by the not guilty verdict following the George Zimmerman trial even though he shared in many citizens’ disappointment.
“The verdict is consistent with (Florida) law, but it’s not consistent with justice,” Coleman said. “And that’s the difficult thing for people to reconcile. That’s a very hard pill to swallow.”
So hard in fact that demonstrations and protests have broken out in major cities across the country in the aftermath of Zimmerman’s acquittal of second-degree murder in the killing Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Fla.
A veteran practitioner of juris prudence, Coleman spent five years as an assistant district attorney in New York City before becoming a federal trial attorney in the civil rights arena, specializing in equal employment opportunity law. Coleman’s cases have been featured on the Huffington PostMSNBC.comLaw360.com and the National Law Journal.
Cultural morays, Coleman attests, as well as other important factors played into the way the law was administered in this case.
In Florida, unlike in his home state of New York, “it’s very much acceptable to shoot first and ask your questions later. That’s the culture. That’s why it’s not surprising that three of the jurors were gun holders. That’s what the culture is,” Coleman said. “It’s not necessarily foreign to them. I think that the law, combined with the culture, combined with a couple of other things such as race and a poor case put on by the prosecution, led to what the eventual outcome was.”
Unlike many ordinary laymen and women, who think that the state botched key witnesses — most notably Martin’s friend Rachel Jeantel — Coleman believes a much bigger prosecutorial error helped decide the outcome.
“Rachel Jeantel did fine. I think the bigger miscue [is] the prosecution let the narrative get away from them and they did not do a good job of controlling the narrative. The defense was able to take ahold of the narrative and they never gave it back and the prosecution never went and reclaimed it.
“[The state] tried to reclaim the narrative during the summation, and I think they did a very good job on the summation and the rebuttal. But, by that time, it was too little too late,” Coleman continues. “They had allowed the entire course of the trial to be about too many little details that had detracted from the bottom line. And the bottom line was: you had a 17-year-old, who was unarmed, who had done nothing wrong, who was dead. That was undisputed. You had a person in that room that was the shooter. That was undisputed. George Zimmerman was the killer. That was undisputed. The verdict is that a young man is dead and no one is held responsible for it. They lost the case when they lost the narrative. They didn’t sell it right. They didn’t make that clear. They had that part of their strategy but they assumed that’s what the jury would surmise that.”
Coleman believes it is “highly unlikely” that the U.S. Department of Justice will bring forth any other charges against Zimmerman. The NAACP and other groups pressed Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate the former neighborhood watchman.
“Some see Trayvon Martin as the modern-day Emmett Till, and that may be true. But the federal anti-hate crime statutes as they are written do not fit the facts in the Zimmerman case,” Coleman said.
Coleman added that the FBI, a bureau within the Department of Justice, had already interviewed Zimmerman and 30 people last year to determine if Zimmerman was guilty of a hate crime in following, confronting and shooting Martin. The answer was “no.”
*originally published on 7/16 at rollingOut.com